Skip to content

vLLM: Forged multimodal UUID + P0/P1 processor-cache eviction drift: unauthenticated remote crash of the whole vLLM engine

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Oct 6, 2026 in vllm-project/vllm • Updated Oct 23, 2026

Package

pip vllm (pip)

Affected versions

< 0.31.0

Patched versions

0.31.0

Description

Summary

Multimodal content parts (image_url, video_url, input_audio, ...) accept a user-supplied uuid field that vLLM uses verbatim as the item's cache identity (mm_hash). The two frontend/engine processor caches (P0 "sender" cache in the API process, P1 "receiver" cache in the EngineCore process) are independent LRU caches whose evictions are not synchronized, and the P1 hit path performs zero consistency validation — it silently substitutes the cached item's tensor data for whatever the current request actually contains.

A single unauthenticated client can exploit this to kill the entire engine, deterministically, with default server flags:

  1. Seed: send a small image with uuid="U". Both caches now map U to an item with N_A visual tokens (e.g. 4).
  2. Drift: send ~70 requests, each carrying a unique uuid, a max-size image, and an over-long text prompt. Each request is rejected with 400 — but after its image has been inserted into the P0 cache (insertion happens during chat rendering, before prompt-length validation), so these requests fill P0 without ever reaching the engine/P1. U is evicted from P0 only.
  3. Kill: send a large image with uuid="U". P0 misses → the image is freshly processed and the prompt is spliced with N_B (e.g. 2048+) placeholder tokens; the request carries full data to the engine, but P1 still has U → the engine discards the fresh data and substitutes the stale N_A-row tensor. The scheduler plans for N_B encoder slots while the worker merges N_A embeddings into N_B placeholders → ValueError: Attempted to assign 4 = 4 multimodal tokens to 2048 placeholders at vllm/model_executor/models/utils.py:711 → uncaught in the EngineCore busy loop → _send_engine_dead() → the EngineCore process dies, every API server reports EngineDeadError and shuts down. /health never recovers; the deployment needs a full restart.

Verified end-to-end on the official vllm/vllm-openai:v0.29.0 image with Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct, default configuration (no flags beyond --served-model-name/--gpu-memory-utilization): after 70 flood requests the kill request returned 500 EngineCore encountered an issue and /health went dead permanently. The vulnerable code is byte-identical on main (post-0.29.0).

Details

1. The client-controlled uuid becomes the cache hash verbatim. vllm/entrypoints/chat_utils.py:1677 / :1884-1886 read part["uuid"] per content part and pass it through as mm_uuids. In vllm/multimodal/processing/inputs.py:62-63, when no hf_processor_mm_kwargs are present (the default for chat requests), the uuid string is the item hash — no content binding at all:

# vllm/multimodal/processing/inputs.py:62-63
else:
    hashes.append(uuid_item)        # client string used verbatim as mm_hash

2. P0 insertion happens before request validation. In the serving path, render_chat_request (vllm/entrypoints/openai/chat_completion/serving.py:275) runs full mm processing — mm_processor.apply (vllm/renderers/base.py:759) → _cached_apply_hf_processor → _merge_mm_kwargs → cache.get_and_update_item (vllm/multimodal/processing/processor.py:1338), which inserts the processed item into the P0 sender cache (default mm_processor_cache_type="lru", 4 GiB). Only afterwards does get_max_tokens (vllm/entrypoints/serve/utils/api_utils.py:183-186) reject over-long prompts with 400. A request can therefore write to P0 while never reaching the engine — the primitive that desynchronizes P0 from P1. (Public issue #43941 documented this same asymmetry for the opposite drift direction, which was later handled via MultiModalCacheMissError; the P0-miss/P1-hit direction below was never addressed.)

3. P1 substitutes cached data on hash hit with no consistency check. In the EngineCore input thread, preprocess_add_request (vllm/v1/engine/core.py:997-1000) calls mm_receiver_cache.get_and_update_features, which only replaces feature.data (vllm/multimodal/cache.py:673-690) and keeps the request's own mm_position (placeholder layout). On a cache hit the receiver cache returns the stale item wholesale:

# vllm/multimodal/cache.py:739-740  (MultiModalReceiverCache.get_and_update_item)
if (cached_item := self._cache.get(mm_hash)) is not None:
    return cached_item              # fresh data silently discarded; no size/modality check

Only the opposite drift (P0 hit / P1 miss, data=None) is handled, via the retryable MultiModalCacheMissError. Nothing validates that the cached item's modality, shape, or token count matches the current request's placeholders.

4. The mismatch is fatal to the engine. The scheduler plans encoder work from the request's (fresh) placeholder count N_B, while the worker gathers embeddings from the stale N_A-row tensor (encoder-cache hit under the same forged hash, or re-encoding the stale data — both yield N_A rows). _merge_multimodal_embeddings then raises:

# vllm/model_executor/models/utils.py:703-714
inputs_embeds[is_multimodal] = mm_embeds_flat.to(dtype=input_dtype)   # RuntimeError
...
raise ValueError(
    f"Attempted to assign {expr} = {num_actual_tokens} "
    f"multimodal tokens to {num_expected_tokens} placeholders") from e

This exception is raised inside the worker's input preparation with no per-request containment, propagates to the EngineCore busy loop's top-level handler (vllm/v1/engine/core.py:1372), and triggers _send_engine_dead(). The API server's output_handler receives EngineDeadError (vllm/v1/engine/async_llm.py:819) and the whole process tree shuts down. (Issue #55546 independently reported this sink — "one bad multimodal item kills the entire V1 engine tree" — from an organically occurring stale cache entry; this report provides the missing deterministic, remote, single-attacker trigger.)

Cost of the attack. With the default mm_processor_cache_gb=4, one max-size Qwen2.5-VL image (12845056 pixels) caches as ~77 MB, so ~56 flood requests suffice; we used 70. Flood requests are CPU-only image decodes (~0.3 s each here) and can be issued sequentially or concurrently; the total wall-clock cost of the kill was under one minute. Models with larger max_pixels fill the cache in even fewer requests. Note that issuing the flood with successful requests does not work — they would populate P1 as well; rejection after P0 insertion is essential, and the over-long-prompt 400 is one always-available way to get it (no size limits depend on non-default flags).

Impact

Any unauthenticated client that can reach a multimodal vLLM endpoint (/v1/chat/completions, /v1/responses, etc. — all accept content-part uuid) can deterministically crash the entire serving instance: the EngineCore process dies, every in-flight request fails, and the API server exits; the deployment stays down until restarted. In data-parallel or multi-API-server deployments the blast radius extends to the whole engine group (cf. the DP8 outage in #55546). The attack requires no special privileges, no non-default server flags, no race conditions, and costs under a minute of sequential requests at default cache sizes.

This is distinct from the documented "Multimodal Media UUID Security" guidance in docs/usage/security.md, which covers only integrity/confidentiality consequences of uuid collisions (a caller silently receiving another caller's media). The guidance does not mention availability, and following it does not help: the attacker here deliberately collides with their own uuid, and the fatal element is the missing consistency check on the P1 hit path plus the unsynchronized eviction of the two caches.

Suggested remediation (any one of these breaks the kill chain):

  1. On a P1 receiver-cache hit, validate the cached item against the request's mm_position (modality and expected embedding count); on mismatch, treat it as a miss (MultiModalCacheMissError) or reject the request — never substitute silently.
  2. Make the feature/placeholder count mismatch in _merge_multimodal_embeddings a per-request error instead of a fatal engine exception (also requested by #55546).
  3. Bind server-side cache identity to content even when a uuid is provided (e.g. hash(content) + uuid), eliminating forged-hash cache hits entirely.
  4. Synchronize P0/P1 evictions (the engine already pushes invalidate to P0 on cache-miss; eviction-direction sync would close the remaining drift).

A public fix is available here: vllm-project/vllm#57833

References

@jperezdealgaba jperezdealgaba published to vllm-project/vllm Oct 6, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 23, 2026
Reviewed Oct 23, 2026
Last updated Oct 23, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(6th percentile)

Weaknesses

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-114050

GHSA ID

GHSA-p92p-rxj5-7p2x

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.