Skip to content

adm-zip: Decompression-bomb protection (fix for CVE-2026-39244) can be bypassed by declaring uncompressed size as 0

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 11, 2026 in cthackers/adm-zip • Updated Sep 29, 2026

Package

npm adm-zip (npm)

Affected versions

<= 0.6.0

Patched versions

0.6.1

Description

Affected package: adm-zip (npm)
Affected version: 0.6.0

Summary

The fix shipped for CVE-2026-39244 (methods/inflater.js) caps zlib's decompression output via maxOutputLength: expectedLength, where expectedLength is read directly from the ZIP entry's attacker-controlled "uncompressed size" header field (CENLEN/LOCLEN). This cap is only applied when expectedLength > 0:

const option = version >= 15 && expectedLength > 0 ? { maxOutputLength: expectedLength } : {};
return zlib.inflateRawSync(inbuf, option);

If an attacker sets the declared uncompressed-size field to exactly 0, this condition is false, option becomes {}, and no output cap is passed to zlib at all. Node then falls back to zlib's own internal default limit (several GB), so a small, highly-compressible payload can still be decompressed to a very large size in memory -- the same class of resource-exhaustion issue the original CVE addressed, just triggered differently.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Build a ZIP archive containing one DEFLATE-compressed entry whose real content is highly redundant (e.g. several MB of a repeated byte, achieving close to the ~1032:1 theoretical raw-DEFLATE compression ratio).
  2. Patch the entry's declared uncompressed-size fields (both the local file header copy and the central directory copy, 4-byte little-endian values) to 0. The compressed bytes and CRC32 are left untouched -- CRC validation still passes because CRC is computed over the real decompressed output, not the declared size.
  3. Load the archive with new AdmZip(buffer) and call .getEntries()[0].getData() (or readFile/readAsText/extractAllTo/etc. -- all share the same code path).
  4. Observe: decompression succeeds and returns the full-size buffer with no size restriction applied, whereas the same real data with an honest (but undersized) declared value correctly throws Cannot create a Buffer larger than N bytes.

Proof of Concept

Attached script demonstrates a controlled A/B comparison using the identical real payload in both cases -- only the declared-size header field differs:

  • Control (declared size = 1024 bytes, deliberately smaller than the true 4MB output): correctly throws, proving the cap mechanism works when expectedLength > 0.
  • Bypass (declared size = 0, identical real payload): succeeds and returns the full 4,194,304-byte buffer with zero restriction.

Verified reproducible across 3 independent runs.

Impact

Any application that calls adm-zip's read/extract methods on an untrusted ZIP file (upload handlers, CI artifact extraction, email attachment scanning, etc.) can be made to allocate an amount of memory bounded only by zlib's own internal default rather than any limit the application or adm-zip intends -- a small (tens-of-MB) upload can trigger multi-GB memory consumption, risking process crash/OOM.

Suggested Fix

Apply maxOutputLength unconditionally (e.g. defaulting to a sane absolute ceiling, or always passing the declared size regardless of whether it's 0), and/or add an independent compression-ratio check that doesn't rely solely on the attacker-supplied size field.

References

@cthackers cthackers published to cthackers/adm-zip Sep 11, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 29, 2026
Reviewed Sep 29, 2026
Last updated Sep 29, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)

The product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.